Chris Langan's Ultimate Reality

Chris Langan's Ultimate Reality

Share this post

Chris Langan's Ultimate Reality
Chris Langan's Ultimate Reality
The CTMU and Consciousness 2

The CTMU and Consciousness 2

Chris Langan's avatar
Chris Langan
Dec 29, 2022
∙ Paid
29

Share this post

Chris Langan's Ultimate Reality
Chris Langan's Ultimate Reality
The CTMU and Consciousness 2
14
2
Share

This is a continuation of the post “The CTMU and Consciousness”.

As already noted, there are two Nobel Prize-winning physicists in this distribution, both affiliated with Cambridge: Brian Josephson (1973), one of the youngest Nobel Laureates ever (he received the prize for work done when he was just 22), and Roger Penrose (2020), who by wide consensus belongs to the crème de la crème of mathematical physicists. Roger has thus far been silent. However, there is now one more active participant in the discussion, “DG” (an associate of Jack Sarfatti; Jack’s reference to “Zielinski” corresponds to “PZ” in part 1).

Here, I continue the discussion by responding to critiques of Immanuel Kant, explaining how his work relates to the CTMU. In a nutshell, the same applies to Kant’s philosophy that applies to every other important work of philosophy in history: it culminates in the CTMU, the supertautological convergence of metaphysics. [Pardon my seeming impatience in some parts of this exchange, as it is not entirely unreasonable under the circumstances.]

Jack leads off with a pun.

Jack: “Kant’s work was DOO DOO! ;-) It Kant work!”

CML: Kant's work is both insightful and influential. However, Jack is right - it doesn't quite work. There was a problem or two with it. It needed a little restructuring.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Christopher Michael Langan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share