UN Claims Oscar for "Information Acting"

Truth, goodness, and intelligence are notoriously hard concepts to define. About the closest that the mainstream has come is this: “Truth, goodness, and intelligence are whatever our officially designated experts say they are. And don’t argue, or we’ll kick you out of college and put you in a bread line.”

There’s also this, preferred by globalists: “Truthfulness, goodness, and intelligence are psychological traits which conduce to the insatiable, totally uninhibited accumulation and abuse of money and power by those of us who already have them. In short, these terms all describe total compliance with Globalism, Inc.”

Of course, there’s an obvious problem with both definitions: the first is meaningless, and the second is belied by the fact that quite a few dishonest, malevolent dim bulbs seem to be rolling in wealth and power and generating a lot of globalist propaganda. But this turns out to be no problem at all, because for globalists, the definition of terms is strictly an exercise in creativity rather than logic.

When globalist narratives are so obviously factually untrue that they are bought by no one with any real intelligence (i.e., the ability to distinguish between what’s true and what isn’t), we are simply reminded that as the definition of “goodness” implies that opposition to globalism is “badness” or “evil”, real intelligence equates to “evil” (not to mention dishonesty and stupidity). Intelligence is thus a matter of going along to get along with one’s globalist masters, quod erat demonstrandum.

But what about those “evil” people who refuse to let their actual intelligence be thusly redefined, and like a disgusting basket of deplorables, bitterly cling to their stubborn resentment of transparent globalist falsehoods that make monkeys of all who believe them? What can be done about the “misinformation” propagated by these deniers?